Practice Area Category: Truck Accident Case Results

Fred Eisenberg, Dan Sherry, Jr., and Jess Colliver secured a confidential $39 million settlement in a truck accident case. Our client was a rear-seat passenger, and it was disputed whether he was wearing his seatbelt. A commercial truck driver failed to properly yield while turning, causing his truck to collide with the car our client was riding in.

Our client suffered devastating spinal cord injuries that rendered him a quadriplegic, requiring him to depend on others for all activities of daily living. The $39 million settlement will provide the care that he will need every day for the rest of his life.

Attorneys Fred Eisenberg and Todd Schoenhaus settled a truck accident case for $9 million after two years of litigation and one mediation. The settlement was reached as a trial was set to begin. In this case, our client was a single mother whose car was struck in a head-on collision with a tractor trailer when the truck crossed the center line. The truck driver had a history of medical issues and safety violations, was overly fatigued, and should not have been permitted by his employer to operate a commercial vehicle. Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury, which the trucking company vigorously disputed, and broke multiple bones. She is permanently unable to work or care for herself. The $9 million settlement will help provide the care that she will need for the rest of her life.

A motorist suffered massive facial fractures, the loss of an eye and psychological problems when her car ran into a tractor-trailer that was blocking the highway. As the 40-foot-long tractor-trailer was backing into a parking lot, it blocked the westbound lane. The evening was dark and there were no streetlights. While Eisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry, P.C. believed they had a strong case, uncertainty regarding the jurors’ potential view of the case facilitated the decision to go to arbitration. EEisenberg Winkler Jeck Schwartz Schoenhaus & Sherry, P.C., argued that the truck driver chose the least safe option for entering the parking lot. In addition, there were no spotters to warn oncoming traffic and no reflective tape on the sides of the vehicle. The lack of skid marks at the scene and other evidence suggested that the injured driver didn’t see the tractor-trailer. The arbitrator’s final judgment took into account the degree of responsibility held by each of the parties involved for the accident.